Taxpayers who employ staff should remember the following important dates and obligations:
Fringe benefits tax ('FBT')
31st March 2025 marks the end of the 2024/25 FBT year. Employers should remember the following regarding their FBT tax time obligations.
Pay as you go ('PAYG') withholding
Taxpayers need to withhold the right amount of tax from payments they make to their employees and other payees and pay those amounts to the ATO.
Single touch payroll ('STP')
Employers should finalise their STP data by 14th July 2025 for the 2024/25 financial year (there may be a later due date for any closely held payees).
Super guarantee ('SG')
The ATO has the following tips to help taxpayers get their BAS right before they lodge:
Fuel tax credits changed on 3rd February, and taxpayers could receive more savings for fuel they have acquired on and from this date. Different rates apply based on the type of fuel, when it was acquired and what activity it is used for.
The ATO has the following tips for taxpayers to ensure they are claiming correctly.
ATO "busts" NFP myths
Editor: As the Not-for-profit ('NFP') self-review return is due in March, the ATO has recently published a document 'busting' various NFP 'myths'.
Myth 1: All NFPs are income tax exempt.
ATO response: This is not true. Some NFPs are income tax exempt and some are taxable.
Myth 2: There is only one way to lodge the NFP self-review return.
ATO response: There are three ways, as follows:
Myth 3: Anyone can lodge the NFP self-review return online.
ATO response: If lodging via Online services for business, anyone authorised to access the return in Online Services can lodge. If a registered tax agent has been engaged, they can also prepare and lodge the return in Online services for agents.
Myth 4: If a person is unsure whether their NFP has charitable purposes, then they do not need to lodge.
ATO response: The self-review return still needs to be lodged, even if it is not certain whether the NFP is charitable.
In a recent decision, the Administrative Review Tribunal ('ART') rejected a taxpayer's claim for input tax credits on the basis that all the relevant GST returns (i.e., BASs) were lodged out of time.
For the GST periods from 1st October 2015 to 31st March 2017, the taxpayer filed each of her GST returns more than four years after they were due. The taxpayer still claimed input tax credits totalling over $10,000 for this period.
The ATO disallowed this claim, on the basis that none of the input tax credits were claimed within the four-year period, as required by the GST Act.
The ART upheld the ATO's decision, noting that, as the taxpayer did not file the GST returns within the four-year period "she did not have input tax credits taken into account . . . As a consequence, . . . (she) simply ceased to be entitled to those input tax credits."
The Full Federal Court recently dismissed the ATO's appeal against an AAT decision that unpaid present entitlements ('UPEs') owing by a trust to a corporate beneficiary were not "loans" for Division 7A purposes.
A corporate beneficiary had become entitled to a share of the income of a trust for the 2013 to 2017 income years. Parts of these entitlements remained outstanding, resulting in UPEs. The ATO treated these UPEs as loans from the corporate beneficiary back to the trust (and, in consequence, as "deemed dividends" made to the trust).
The AAT held at first instance that a loan had not been made in this case.
The Full Federal Court upheld the AAT's decision, noting that a loan for Division 7A purposes requires an obligation to repay an amount, not merely the creation of an obligation to pay an amount (such as when a trust distributes income to a beneficiary).
Please note: Many of the comments in this publication are general in nature and anyone intending to apply the information to practical circumstances should seek professional advice to independently verify their interpretation and the information’s applicability to their particular circumstances.